Dear Ms. Hoffman and Mr. Novak:

	I read "A Detailed Analysis of the Conceptual, Logical, and
Methodological Flaws in the Article: 'Marketing Pornography on the
Information Superhighway'"
(http://www2000.ogsm.vanderbilt.edu/novak/rimm.review.html) and found one passage
very interesting:

         *      Rimm:          In footnote 30 on page 1865, Rimm argues that
                               the 11% of computer users at the private
                               university "block" site statisticians from
                               monitoring in order to "avoid detection" of
                               their online activities.  After discussing a
                               behavioral analysis of child molesters, he
                               proposes that "it is possible that some
                               Internet users who block their accounts prefer
                               sexual images of children and wish to avoid
                               detection."
 
                This argument is one of the more outrageous in the paper
                and represents an invalid causal link.  In the first
                place, there is no evidence that t